Yonaxis I.P. Law Group Logo
Category: section 2a | Yonaxis I.P. Law Group

Category: "section 2a"

of 1

Free Speech Considerations in Trademark Law

failuretofunction firstamendment trademarkregistration +1 more

Trademark law intersects with First Amendment free speech rights in several key ways: Prior Restraint and Content-Based Restrictions: When the government denies trademark registration based on the...

Understanding the False Suggestion Doctrine in Trademark Law

falsesuggestion trademarkregistration trademarks

The false suggestion doctrine is a limitation on trademark registration, designed to protect the public from misleading associations with recognized entities or symbols. Overview Section 2(a) of the...

Heating Up: FIREBALL Not Generic

descriptiveness distinctiveness generic +1 more

Understanding Trademark Genericism Trademark law exists to protect distinctive marks that identify the source of a particular good or service. However, when a trademark becomes so widely known that...

Trademarks Post-Tam & Brunetti

Two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Matal v. Tam, decided in 2017, and Iancu v. Brunetti, decided this past May, both dealt with registration of trademarks under 15 U.S.C. §1052(a) (§2(a))...

SCOTUS Watch: Bar on Immoral and Scandalous Marks Violates First Amendment

Source: FUCT™, soon to be FUCT® On June 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Iancu v. Brunetti, dealing with the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a) bars to trademark registration’s collision against...

Fed Circuit Watch: Lanham Act Section 2(a) Scandalousness Clause Deemed Unconstitutional

On December 15, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down its decision in In re Brunetti. In Brunetti, the Federal Circuit panel, consisting of Judges Moore,...

The Slants’ Saga Ends: USPTO Registers Service Mark

On November 14, 2017, six years to the day after the application was first filed with the USPTO which precipitated the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Matal v. Tam[1] striking down the...

USPTO Issues Exam Guidelines Consistent with Tam Decision

On June 26, 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued an updated Examination Guideline 01-17, consistent with the recent Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S.\\\_ (2017), ruling by the United...

SCOTUS Watch: Lanham Act’s §2(a) Disparagement Clause Struck Down

By Brent T. Yonehara On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court finally, and somewhat as expected, handed down its ruling in Matal v. Tam (formerly Lee v. Tam). By a unanimous vote, the Supreme Court...

of 1